cultural criticism | photography | place & space

He is Passing By

I'm looking for an cultural milieu where I can live, love, create, explore in joy and my unconventionalness and still be ever faithful to my God. What I have found is two very different and not altogether different camps who will welcome me, but their welcome implies a certain expectation that I will be accountable to their respective groupthink. However, will I stand before either camp to account on that last day?

This first camp, let’s call them Sinestra, challenges me to cherish, respect, and stand in awe of the created order, well up to a point. I know that this created order is a work of high art, and that it points me to the Artist. The problem is that Sinestra asks me to pay no attention to the Man behind the curtain...the temple veil. Sinestra also curiously expects that I should use my body...this created order writ small...in ways that disrespect how and why it was created. When pressed, Sinestra will wax spiritual and say that the Artist says, "it is good," and create a new unchallengeable dogma. In the face of everything that I know...in everything that has been revealed to me in the artwork and by the Artist Himself...I cannot cotton to this notion.

Further Sinestra prods me on to use my gifts to bring joy to myself and to all...to go out on a limb and to birth forth. Only the sole appropriate limb has been carefully chosen to the exclusion of another...in spite of their language of inclusivity. Our gifts and our accumulating and yet selective knowledge divorced from Wisdom propel us toward progress. This new dogma expects me to believe that the progress wrought will somehow be what saves us. Again, I am witness...eyes wide open and in horror...to what has been wrought. Pity...this squandering of talent and wonder that so often goes misused or totally unused for that fear.

The other camp, Destra if a name must be used, has the clear and often consuming desire to remain faithful. They see what is behind that curtain...even if imperfectly. Maybe it is this inevitable and wholly acceptable imperfection that results in their handwringing over minutia. Well, the devil is in the details; I have met him there often, and always to my undoing. Joy and the desire to explore and to serve in love become sabotaged by ruminating over the cracks in the chimney. Ah the smoke is all around it is even in the sanctuary. Yes indeed it is...has been for a long time really. What can I do about this? I am but a very small creature. I will not fret if I have not the power to affect change, and if I have such power, please let me use it in a way that is proactive, creative, constructive, and without fear. This is my challenge to myself and to any who will listen.

While I perceive that Destra’s reading of the signs is more often than not true, their reaction just as often denies that what they behold is itself the Truth. I get the impression at times that we are expected turn ourselves inside out over every incidence of improper act, speech, and thought. I’ve seen men do as much. The response to this toxic shame or to that primal fear and to whatever other affective instability inherent in their makeup lead them to a near bottomless despair that must in itself have cried out to heaven. It certainly made me stand up within myself and say this is not the work of the Spirit.

The thing is that Sinestra and Destra are really one in the same people, from our brokenness we react out of fear...fear of the other...fear of the self. All to defend our crumbs, at the beginning of the day fear is what lashes out and at the end of the day fear is what wins out. I am unimpressed and I am weary. I don’t much want to play with either Sinestra or Destra even though I mustn’t be alone...or so both keep telling me. I simply want to gaze in awe, to soak up and contribute to that beauty, and reach out and grab onto His hem when He passes by.

May Day! May Day!

I always loved attending the annual May Day parade and festival in South Minneapolis. The giant puppets are awesome; the event is dramatic, colorful, and festive; and it appealed to my latent pagan heartbeat. More than this, it celebrates spring. The importance of this idea in Minnesota should be clear to you when you realize that spring is being celebrated in May!

Well spring is around the corner, but this year I seriously doubt that I will be attending the May Day parade. You see, my paradigm is undergoing radical clarification. This is important because more than anything stated above, May Day is political - very political. Last year, I also learned how fundamentally hypocritical many of the themes presented there are. A few points that illustrate this are:

  • Women marching to protest the slaughter of children in third world countries due to capitalism, war, and disease juxtaposed with a militant feminism which has promoted the slaughter of some 40 million children in America since 1973 and exports this to third world countries by way of the United Nations.
  • Promoting peace and tolerance while at the same time singling out specific groups and individuals for demonization, revile, and hatred.
  • Decrying hate crimes while parading Catholic bishops in effigy as targets to hate and ridicule.
  • Promoting a more powerful United Nations as a means of increasing freedom, without explaining how surrendering more control to additional layers of bureaucracy on a global level will ever ensure freedom to individuals.
  • Demonizing the media as a global propaganda machine while calling for global mass education programs. I guess that one man's propaganda is another man's education.

Given current world events, I can only surmise the impending spin at May Day 2003, and I am certain that it will be ever so more vulgar. Still I am curious, and a non-participatory attendance may be possible if I dust off and utilize my training as an anthropologist - if only for the puppets.

Film Review: Cast Away

Time idolizer and über-manager Chuck Noland, irritatingly portrayed by Tom Hanks in this FedEx infomercial, begins his odyssey by deliberation and making conscious choices. The first is to enter a car which leads to boarding an airplane. These actions represent the millions of our daily little crossroads and at the same time our free-will. An accident of history then plunges Chunk into a new chapter of his life that includes the tests of social isolation and physical survival without taken-for-granted commodities.

Hanks' performance improves at this point in inverse proportion to his dialogue, and the viewer is presented with several sub-themes. Elements of Oceanic Cargo Cult are blended with corporate & social duties, love, madness, and liberation, all of which are enveloped by a totalitarian and atheistic sea. Chuck is at first antagonized by nature and conflicted between the gifts of cargo and his duty as the FedEx Man. This conflict is resolved after he buries the unfortunate and washed-up Pilot Al. This event is the symbolic and half-complete burial of Chuck's "old self".

Chuck now begins to accept the gifts of cargo and his ability to survive and to stand up to the brutality of nature increases. One piece of cargo reserved in special status, however, is left inviolate; it is a package with a butterfly image drawn on it and stands in as a symbol of rebirth and liberation. The physical and symbolic meanings behind this piece in concert with another piece of flotsam - the busted biffy - leads ultimately to Chuck's physical but not spiritual liberation.

The themes of love and madness are less convincingly developed. Surrounded by the unquestionable totality of nature, Chuck loses touch with reality and is consoled by a photo and the memories of his fiancée Kelly, which with the reserved FedEx package are venerated and anchor him as the only two remaining pieces of his "old self". The real degeneration into madness and spiritual void is portrayed by Chuck's relationship with Wilson the volleyball head.

The end of the film is a hollow let down: love lost, the corporate embrace, and the crossroads on the Texas plain with horizons as wide as the sea, all show the futility of ever having left the island -- the futility of choice. All in all, this is an appropriate film with which to enter the 21st century.